Elon Musk Disregards General Motors' Autonomous Vehicles
Cruise, the autonomous vehicle division of General Motors, boasts a fleet of robotaxis operating around the clock in San Francisco. However, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, has shown little faith in GM's endeavors.
Despite his commitment to promoting the adoption of electric vehicles and establishing a sustainable energy economy, Musk remains skeptical of GM's autonomous vehicle initiatives. While he has expressed admiration for Ford's approach to electric vehicles, he has dismissed GM's efforts in this particular area.
In a recent statement, Musk revealed Tesla's plan to expand its network of superchargers to accommodate owners of Ford Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning models, Ford's flagship electric vehicles. This move signals a willingness to collaborate with Ford in advancing the EV industry, despite the competitive dynamics between the two companies.
Musk's respect for Jim Farley, Ford's CEO, is evident, and he has praised Ford's overall strategy in the EV market. However, he remains focused on maintaining Tesla's position as a global leader in electric vehicles and views Ford as a formidable challenger.
"The electric F-150 (Lightning) has garnered significant demand," Musk acknowledged, recognizing Ford's success in capturing consumer interest.
Is Cruise's Self-Driving Technology "Brittle"?
Despite Elon Musk's positive remarks and unprecedented agreement with a legacy automaker, his perception of General Motors (GM), another automotive giant, tells a different story. The relationship seems more characterized by a cool rivalry. Musk consistently seizes opportunities to criticize or ridicule GM, as demonstrated in a recent incident.
On June 4, a devoted Tesla fan named Steven Mark Ryan took to Twitter to share his commentary on a short video showcasing a self-driving vehicle developed by Cruise. In the video, the Cruise vehicle comes to a halt in the middle of a street due to construction barriers blocking its path.
For Ryan, this image of the stationary Cruise vehicle, unable to reverse or maneuver left or right due to the closed street, serves as evidence that Cruise's technology falls significantly short of Tesla's autonomy capabilities.
According to Ryan's tweet, "Generalized autonomy (as seen in Tesla) is 100x more challenging than the brittle 'self-driving' tech we see here. If everything perfectly aligns with the HD pre-mapped data, it can perform its party trick of driving you around. But if something doesn't match, it becomes helpless and scared, requiring human intervention."
Ryan's remarks highlight the perceived limitations of Cruise's self-driving technology, suggesting that it heavily relies on pre-mapped data and lacks the flexibility and adaptability exhibited by Tesla's more advanced autonomous systems.
The Clash of Cruise and Tesla's Full Self-Driving Systems
Continuing the conversation, Musk didn't shy away from taking a jab at the technology developed by the Detroit giant, led by CEO Mary Barra.
"Yes, extremely susceptible to local conditions and lacks scalability," the billionaire entrepreneur affirmed.
Musk implies that true autonomous driving goes beyond meticulously mapped streets since such a system would cease to function in the presence of accidents, parades, or road constructions. The technology should be capable of handling unforeseen circumstances, obstacles, and more. Failure to do so would result in an unsuccessful endeavor.
Musk suggests that GM's Cruise has underestimated the complexity of the task at hand. According to him, a self-driving car should not struggle with something as basic as a road closure due to construction. In Musk's view, companies should strive to develop a comprehensive solution for autonomous driving that works seamlessly in any scenario.
At the time of this rewrite, Cruise has not provided a comment in response to Musk's criticism.
Cruise, a subsidiary of GM specializing in autonomous technologies, is often referred to as the robotaxi unit. While GM is the majority shareholder of Cruise, the legacy automaker has also partnered with companies like Honda, Walmart, and Microsoft for this venture.
Recently, Cruise obtained permission to operate self-driving vehicles in San Francisco round the clock, giving it a significant advantage over its competitors.
A year ago, the company was among the first to receive authorization from the city to launch a robotaxi service. However, it faced restrictions on operating between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., and its services were limited to weather conditions without "heavy rain, heavy fog, heavy smoke, hail, sleet, or snow."
"In April, Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt announced that a small portion of our fleet is now offering driverless rides 24/7 throughout San Francisco."
Aside from San Francisco, Cruise also operates a fleet of robotaxis in Phoenix and Austin.
Meanwhile, Tesla continues to enhance its Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, an advanced driving-assistance feature that allows Tesla vehicles to perform various maneuvers autonomously. However, it is important to note that FSD does not make the vehicles fully autonomous. Musk recently stated that Tesla cars could achieve full autonomy as early as this year.
"Tesla will experience a significant breakthrough, similar to the impact of ChatGPT, possibly this year, but certainly no later than next year," the technology magnate shared with CNBC. He referred to ChatGPT as an example of the progress made in artificial intelligence. Musk further explained, "Three million cars will drive themselves without any human intervention. Then it will be five million, and eventually ten million cars."
Regulators are currently investigating FSD due to its involvement in several accidents.
0 Comments